Frill Alternatives: 7 Best Feedback & Roadmap Tools (2026)

You are exploring alternatives to Frill, which means you are looking for better prioritization, AI-powered insights, reasonable pricing, and deeper integrations. 

Frill is a solid customer feedback and feature request platform, but as the team scales, it might not be able ot provide advanced segmentation, automation and structured workflow. That’s why many SaaS organizations start searching for Frill alternatives.

To meet your organization’s needs and requirements, we have analyzed multiple platforms and found some of them to be the best alternatives to Frill. 

You will get the complete overview of the Frill alternative tools, their core features, pros, cons, and pricing, in this carefully curated guide.

Key Takeaways

• Frill is designed keeping in mind the starting teams and early startups. It has a clean UI and offers basic feedback organization, helping teams to understand user demands.

• Saas teams search for Frill alternatives to get better workflow organization, deeper features and more advanced automated functionality. 

• Best Frill alternatives, including ProductBridge, Featurebase, Sleekplan, Feedbear, etc. work similarly to Frill, but each of them have their strengths. 

Top Frill Alternatives in 2026

We thoroughly evaluated the existing product roadmapping and feedback management tools to find the top Frill alternatives that align with Frill’s specific audience. 

1. Productbridge

Productbridge is a top and strong Frill alternative tool which centralizes your complete feedback management with built-in AI-powered insights. 

This alternative to Frill goes beyond what Frill offers you, by auto-categorizing, deduping, and scoring the user’s request, building the roadmap on real user demand, and auto-notifying users on shipment of their requests. 

Core Capabilities of Productbridge

• Public Feedback Infrastructure: Both public and private boards are available, including internal boards and segment-based boards for specific user groups. 

• Voting: Productbridge allows users to vote on feature requests and add context to ideas to help you understand demand before committing development time.

• Segmentation & Targeting: Advanced filtering by customer attributes, revenue tiers, or user groups and also this Frill alternative understands the revenue impact.

• AI-Powered Organization: Strong AI-powered insights with AI-assisted tagging, grouping, categorizing, and feedback analysis.

• Roadmap: This platform helps you build roadmaps that turn feedback into planned work and keep customers in the loop.

• Customization: Offers logo and domain customizations just like Frill does.

• Workflow Integration: You can work with your stack and can integrate multiple tools for a better workflow. 

Where Productbridge Outperforms Frill 

The biggest advantage of Produtbridge is always available and understands the organization’s needs. The platform does not give confused pricing structure as your team scales and does not limit you from accessing certain features under a certain plan. 

Modern teams require modern and more automated workflows, which Productbridge offers through its Autobridge AI to automate minor tasks and help you increase productivity. 

Changelog is also available in Productbridge, where you can announce every release and make customers feel heard. 

Where Productbridge Falls Short

• More structured organization which some starting teams may not require

• May introduce more configuration compared to the lightweight Frill alternatives

Pricing of Productbridge

2. Featurebase

Featurebase is focused on providing a roadmap with transparency and focuses on publicly engaging with the user community, allowing teams to deliver quickly.

This Frill alternative also implemented AI that organizes the user feedback and creates a single workflow for publishing to its customers and the user community.

Core Capabilities of Featurebase

• Public Feedback Infrastructure: Public feedback portals to request features, and also, widgets can be embedded.

• Voting: Not only can users post their ideas, but users can also vote for other ideas, comment, and downvote. Featurebases scores them by importance.

• Segmentation & Targeting: Featurebase provides user feedback segmentation based on revenue value, and you can have custom groups.

• AI-Powered Organization: Featurebase’s AI feature is useful for auto-tagging and smarter grouping of the requests.

• Roadmap: You can notify users about the changes in the features as per their requests or update them about the status of work.

• Customization: Custom domain, branding, and 40+ languages are supported in this Frill alternative.

• Workflow Integration: Integrations with multiple tools like Linear, Slack, and ClickUp is available, like other Frill alternatives. 

Where Featurebase Outperforms Frill 

The AI feature eases feedback organization from Featurebase positions it as a strong Frill alternative because Frill relies more on manual organization. 

Next thing, Featurebase segments user feedback based on revenue-impact and custom user groups. This helps the teams to prioritize the requested features. Whereas Frill mainly focuses on voting and manual categorization.

Along with this, advanced roadmap publishing and a built-in changelog, automation and AI make Featurebase a strong alternative to Frill. 

Where Featurebase Falls Short

Compared to other Frill alternatives, Featurebase: 

• Advanced enterprise governance features are limited

• Prioritizes feedback based in segmentation and voting 

• Roadmap planning is not as deep as other Frill alternatives

Pricing of Featurebase 

3. Canny

Canny provides an organized board and prioritizes impact. It is a similar tool to Featurebase, one of the top Frill alternatives. 

With Canny, you are not limited to making product decisions based on limited data,  but on real analytics and your customer base. It does not give you just surface-level voting; it gives you customer-driven product decisions.

Core Capabilities of Canny

• Public Feedback Infrastructure: Users can submit ideas on public feedback boards, comment, and also track their request progress.

• Voting: Teams can see the total vote count on the feature requests to prioritize the tasks. 

• Segmentation & Targeting: Customer fields are given and it segments users to effectively prioritize the requests. This alternative to Frill allows you to filter feedback by company size, plan tier or revenue. 

• AI-Powered Organization: Autopilot is Canny’s AI-powered suite to automate the collection, organizing, and refining of feedback.

• Roadmap: Both public and private roadmaps with customizable status stages are available in Canny. 

• Customization: Based on the premium plan, you can customize logo, colors, and domain setup. 

• Workflow Integration: Being a Frill alternative, it offers better and multiple integrations with tools like Linear, Intercom, Salesforce, HubSpot, etc. 

Where Canny Outperforms Frill?

Frill mainly focuses on allowing public feedback boards, but Canny supports both public and private boards with structured segmentation, tagging, and internal feedback capture as well. 

This makes it one of the best Frill alternatives since it provides stronger segmentation and internal feedback consolidation capabilities. 

Similar to Featurebase, another Frill alternative, Canny also includes AI-assisted features, whereas Frill focuses directly on manual organization.

Where Canny Falls Short?

Although it can be considered one of the best Frill alternatives, it also has its downsides.

• Pricing increases as the organization scales

• Advanced features require higher plan tiers

• Budget predictability becomes more challenging

Pricing of Canny

4. Nolt

This feedback collection tool is so similar to Frill and is one of the best Frill alternatives you can choose if you need basic feedback organization, feature requests, and effective user management. 

Nolt keeps in mind startups and developer-led products, and so simplifies the whole customer feedback management just like Frill does. So we’ve found Nolt as another top alternative to Frill.

Core Capabilities of Nolt

• Public Feedback Infrastructure: Boards for users to give their feature requests, upvote and comment on ideas. These boards are clean and easy to navigate.

• Voting: The priority is based on upvoting and customer engagement. So, Nolt tells you what the customers are demanding, more.

• Segmentation & Targeting: Nolt does not go deep in segmentation but still provides basic categorization ang tagging.

• AI-Powered Organization: There is no advanced AI clustering. As a Frill alternative, Nolt also relies on manual organization.

• Roadmap: Allows you to publicly communicate planned and shipped features.

• Customization: Teams can customize logo, domain, and adjust colors.

• Workflow integration: Common to most of the Frill alternatives, Nolt also integrates with tools like Slack and Zapier. 

Where Nolt Outperforms Frill 

What Nolt seems to be an easy Frill alternative is that it is suitable for early-stage startups and growing organizations. These teams do not prefer complex and more heavy functionalitied platforms. 

Nolt is simple and speeds your setup process. It is less complex compared to other Frill alternatives. Also, it is a more cost-accessible option for growing products. 

Where Nolt Falls Short

• No AI features for automation

• Does only basic segmentation 

• Not suitable for enterprise level teams

Pricing of Nolt

5. Upvoty

With its user-friendly interface, Upvoty is among the best alternatives to Frill for its feedback management capabilities and simple management. It creates customer-engagement-focused product management. 

If you are looking for Frill alternatives that is neither too complicated nor too simple, then Upvoty may be the right choice.

Core Capabilities of Upvoty

• Public Feedback Infrastructure: The team gets categorized requests from the users  who write their ideas and feedback on public boards. Also, there is an option to change the visibility settings. 

• Voting: Upvoty shows on top the requests based on the vote counts they get. This helps the team to understand the customer demand signal.

• Segmentation & Targeting: Basic tagging and feedback categorization is there but Upvoty may not segment customer views in to detailed level. 

• AI-Powered Organization: ‘Merge AI’ is present to duplicate posts easily.

• Roadmap: Managers can publish roadmaps to inform users about their work process and can also customize status labels. 

• Customization: This frill alternative offers flexible branding customization with custom domains. Also, you get to customize logo designs and color. There is a white-label feedback environment, as well.

• Workflow Integration: Integrates with tools like Zapier, Slack, and project management systems.

Where Upvoty Outperforms Frill

Upvoty is a more flexible option that offers a more customizable presentation with a white-label feedback option, whereas Frill offers basic public boards for ideas and discussions.

Upvoty is easier to set up and work with, and easier to deploy, which makes it strongly suitable for beginner teams or scaling organizations.

The clean user interface of Upvoty brings in more user engagement. This helps the teams indirectly to get their customers more engaged with the product.

Where Upvoty Falls Short

• Limited advanced prioritization frameworks

• No built-in AI-powered feedback analysis

• Limited automation layers

Despite all these, for a regular Frill user, Upvoty makes a good Frill alternative and might suit and align well with their requirements. 

Pricing of Upvoty

6. Sleekplan 

Sleekplan offers both feature request management and customer management. It tracks customer satisfaction, and like other Frill alternatives, this platform has a focus on closing the feedback loop through sentiment analysis and structured visibility.

This alternative to Frill has a combination of transparency of the roadmap as well as the customer intent. It combines roadmap transparency with customer intent analysis. 

Core Capabilities of Sleekplan

• Public Feedback Infrastructure: Users’ feedback can be publicly viewed, and feedback can be embedded into applications via widgets. 

• Voting: Feedback is prioritised based on upvotes to help teams understand the high-demand features.

• Segmentation & Targeting: On the surface, tagging and feedback categorization. Sleekplan does more of feedback grouping than CRM-linked segmentation.

• AI-Powered Organization: No advanced AI functionality, but you can automate by applying filters. 

• Roadmap: Customizable roadmaps with ‘planned’, ‘in progress’, and ‘completed’ stages to inform users about the status of the product development.

• Customisation: Logo and branding customisations depend on the plan tier, but basic options are still available under lower-cost plans.

• Workflow Integration: Sleekplan allows integrations with Jira, Slack, GitHub, Clickup, etc. 

Where Sleekplan Outperforms Frill

The key differentiator for Sleekplan from some of the other Frill alternatives is that there are built-in CSAT and NPS surveys to measure customer sentiment alongside feature requests. 

Also, this Frill alternative does not redirect users externally to capture feedback; it enables in-app feedback.

Where Sleekplan Falls Short

Though Sleekplan is a good choice for those looking for Frill alternatives, it falls short in some areas, like 

• There is no advances priortization framework

• No in-depth segmentation 

• Vote-count-based categorization and not based on revenue impact

• No deep CRM integrations like other Frill alternatives

Pricing of Sleekplan 

7. Feedbear

Feedbear is a lightweight platform, just like all Frill alternatives, which does not add complicated product management and focuses on customer transparency.

This alternative to Frill allows simple management of public feature discussions and is suitable for startups to mid-sized teams. 

Core Capabilities of Feedbear

• Product Feedback Infrastructure: Public boards for users to communicate their requests and demands, merging of repetitive or similar requests, and also assignment of lifecycle stages for the idea.

• Voting: Votes are aggregated as per the requests and idea. And there are no advanced prioritization methods like revenue-based impact categorisation.

• Segmentation & Tagging: From the boards that the users already placed their requests on, teams can tag as per the category. For example, it may be a bug, API feature, etc.

• AI-Powered Organization: Feedbear relies on manual structuring, tagging, duplicate merging, etc. No specific built-in AI feature, making it a similar tool to Frill.

• Roadmap: Feedbear’s roadmap feature is designed for customer visibility. It helps them understand the stage of the team’s work on the request.

• Customization: Feedbear allows teams to host their feedback board on a custom domain, upload a company logo, and control board visibility settings.

• Workflow Integration: Jira, Github, Slack, Zapier, etc, and other multiple tools can be integrated. 

Where Feedbear Outperforms Frill

What makes Feedbear stand out as the top of the best Frill alternatives is that it functions similarly and, in some cases, offers better functionality than Frill. 

Feedbear has open idea boards with a very straightforward submission flow. So, it is more like a community discussion rather than announcement-driven. 

Feedbear keeps it simple and straight to ideas and status updates and avoids layering additional communication modules. Also, for engineering-led teams, Feedbear shows a strong focus towards GitHub-based workflows. 

Where Feedbear Falls Short

• Lack of AI features

• Shallow customer segmentation

• Might not suit well for big enterprise organizations

Pricing of Feedbear

Conclusion

Choose from the top Frill alternatives based on your team size, requirements, and prioritization for user requests. The right feedback management platform streamlines your product planning management.